DRickard Insurance

607-843-8860

insurance@drickardinsurance.com

 New York StateDRickard Insurance
"Your Favorite Insurance People"
Contact Us 
DRickard InsuranceContact Us 

Your Favorite Insurance People

607-843-8860  insurance@drickardinsurance.com

ProductsPaymentsClaimsInformation

ContactOpportunitiesOffice HoursTales of WoeDisaster LinksGlossaryHelpful HintsFAQs

 

Tales Of Woe*

*Unless you keep your agent and insurer informed.  These are cautionary insurance tales of real or dramatizations of real life scenarios.

 

Who is working on your property?

A Tenant

Bob has a free standing restaurant with only one tenant.  The lease agreement states that the sole tenant must insure the building and that the tenant is also responsible for the upkeep of the property including lawn care and the clearing of snow and ice.

Bill had a tenant shovel snow from his sidewalks and throw down ice melt in exchange for a small decrease in Bill’s rent.  This worked wonderfully for both of them, for a while that is.  Eventually, the tenant failed to salt the walkways after he shoveled.  This was discovered after a visitor to the apartment complex fell.  There was some blame back and forth between Bill and his tenant for the accident.  As the story goes the tenant had run out of rock salt that Bill had been supplying and Bill did not know that.  Time goes on and there is a big snow fall, very deep.  Bill calls the tenant and asks him to shovel the roof off.  The tenant agrees and falls off of the roof.  Needless to say eventually both the visitor who fell and the tenant sue Bill.

Bill has a Business Owner’s Policy that included $1,000,000 liability insurance protection to cover the apartment complex.  Bill notifies his insurance company of the claims about a week or so apart.  The insurer investigates both occurrences.  While the insurer does defend Bill for the slip and fall, they want to use the subrogation clause in the policy to go after his snow removal contract for failure to salt the walk.  There was no contractor to go after because Bill had been compensating the tenant for his service.

For the fall off of the roof the insurer denies duty to defend or pay anything because, according to the insurance company, this person was acting as an employee and a Business Owner’s Policy does not provide worker’s compensation coverage.  Matters get worse when the Department of Labor steps in and declared the tenant to be an employee and that Bill is now fined by the state for not having proper insurance. 

Where does Bill get the money to cover the medical expenses, punitive damages, and fines?  He gets the money from the sale of the apartment complex.

What could Bill have done to save himself from this tragedy?  Hired a contractor to do the work, verifying the contractor had completed operations coverage enough the protect his assets and income potential, workers compensation coverage, an iron clad contract with the contractor requiring Bill be listed as additional insured on all relevant policies, and Bill would keep copies of all of these things proving the contract and insurance policies are in force with the clauses required.   Or, Bill could have protected the worker, who, according to state law fits the description of an employee, with the state required employment insurances.  There are possible other options that could have been explored if Bill had only talked with his insurance agent before using the tenant. 

We urge you to call us so we may help you plan ways to protect your assets.  Be certain to tell us all aspects of your operational planning. 607-843-8860
insurance@drickardinsurance.com

 
Who is working on your property?

A Contractor

The Tenant

 

Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

©1995-2024 DRICKARD INSURANCE All Rights Reserved